Patna High CourtCWJC/813/2015disposed

Amar Pratap Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-07Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.813 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Amar Pratap Singh Son of Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of VillageKumaripur, P.S.- Manihari, District-Katihar.

2. Rajeev Kumar Rajak Son of Manni Rajak, resident of Village- Marangi, P.S.- Mansashi, District- Katihar.

3. Rajendra Rajak Son of Prabhu Rajak, resident of Village- Belouri, P.S.- Sadar Purnia, District- Purnea.

4. Md. Mahatabuddin Son of Md. Suleman, resident of VillageSouharadangi, P.S.- Manihari, District- Katihar

5. Sweta Rani D/O. Lal Mohan Singh resident of Village- Gami Tola, Hariganj, P.S.& District- Katihar.

6. Gyan Chandra Paswan Son of Ram Prasad Paswan, resident of VillageHaflaganj, P.S. - Katihar, District- Katihar.

7. Kumari Kamkum D/O. Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of VillageKumaripur, P.S.- Manihari, District-Katihar.

8. Nazni Begum D/O. Md. Soyabur Rahman, resident of VillageSouharadangi, P.S.- Manihari, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer Katihar.

4. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment) Katihar.

5. The Block Education Officer Mansahi, District- Katihar

6. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Fulhara, Mansahi, District- Katihar.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Fulhara, Mansahi, District- Katihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad For the Respondent/s : AC to GP - 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2017 After some argument, Sri Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners in presence of learned AC to GP No. 15 makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition so that petitioners may avail statutory remedy.

Patna High Court CWJC No.813 of 2015 (3) dt.07-02-2017 2/2 The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above.

It goes without saying that period consumed by the petitioners in pursuing the present petition i.e. from 13.1.2015 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U