Ram Balak Bhagat @ Ram Balak Prasad @ Ram Balak Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46451 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2015 Thana -PAKRIDAYAL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ram Balak Bhagat @ Ram Balak Prasad @ Ram Balak Rai, Son of Late Sahdeo Bhagt, R/o Vill. - Bara Pakar, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N. Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.101 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 212 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 19.04.2015 at 4.15 p.m. the S.I. of Pakrideyal Police Station recorded his self statement that at 8.10 a.m. he along with other SAP force proceeded from the police station for arresting absconder and collecting the information. The apprehended person kept on changing his name but on further interrogation disclosed his name
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46451 of 2015 (3) dt.01-02-2016 2/3 as Jatindra @ Soni. On demand the driver did not produce the valid papers of the vehicle and neither gave any satisfactory report.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact. Though stolen car with valid papers is said to have been purchased by the petitioner but the petitioner states that he had no knowledge with the car in question was a stolen car. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs.40,000/- in the court below which shall be subject to the final disposal of the case.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall deposit Rs.40,000/- in the court below which shall be subject to the final disposal of the case. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46451 of 2015 (3) dt.01-02-2016 3/3 Motihari, in connection with Pakrideyal P.S. Case No.101 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) N.H./- U T