← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33661/2021bail granted

Rajesh Rai @ Rajesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-28Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33661 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-521 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== RAJESH RAI @ RAJESH MAHTO Son of Pramod Mahto Resident of Village - Saghari, P.S.- Mushahari, District - Muzaffarpur, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 521 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 385, 386, 307, 379, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he demanded ransom from the informant at the rate of Rs. 5000/- per day for construction work run by the informant. On denial, the petitioner assaulted the informant with iron rod on his head. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the entire allegation is false. The petitioner is a person of clean

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33661 of 2021(4) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 antecedents and wife of the petitioner has lodged a case against the associates of the informant i.e. Musahari P.S. Case No. 158 of 2020. He has submitted that the present case is counter blast of that case. He has also submitted that injuries sustained by the informant is simple in nature.

The learned Addl.P.P., though, opposed the prayer for bail but conceded the fact that the injuries are simple in nature. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 521 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/Aditi/- U T