Uday Yadav @ Jay Prakash Kumar @ Jay Prakash v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21589 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1182 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Uday Yadav @ Jay Prakash Kumar @ Jay Prakash S/o Shivnarayan Yadav R/o Village - Dhuria, P.S - Kalpa, District - Jehanabad At present R/o - Sadasichak, Salarpur, P.S - Kalpa, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate :
Mr. Ranjeet Patel, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dr. Mritunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 1182 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., lodged on 17.11.2025 by the informant, Deepak Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that during the motorcycle checking, this petitioner was apprehended as he was found without any document/helmet. However, alongwith the help of his accomplice and after scuffling with the Police, the petitioner fled away. This led to the F.I.R..
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21589 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 contrary to the allegation, the true version is that in the name of motorcycle checking, the petitioner was assaulted, was rushed to the hospital. The injury report is there, which followed the complaint as the Police chose not to lodge the F.I.R.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that not only he was driving without any document, also assaulted the Police.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also that there is case and counter case between the parties, both side suffered injuries, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad Town P.S. Case No. 1182 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21589 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 (ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T