Niraj Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10035 of 2021 ====================================================== Niraj Kumar Roy son of Harshit Roy, resident of Village-Thanwar, P.O.- Arapatti, P.S.-Mahishi, District-Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Saharsa.
3.
The Additional Collector, Saharsa.
4.
The District Supply Officer, Saharsa.
5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District-Saharsa. 6.
The Block Supply Officer, Mahishi, District-Saharsa. 7.
The Circle Officer, Mahishi, District-Saharsa. 8.
Ganesh Rai, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Rai, resident of Village and P.O.- Arapatti, P.S.-Mahishi, District-Saharsa.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Mishra, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, Adv.
For the Resp. No.8 :
Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) Date : 24-08-2022 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh for the State as also Mr. Raja Ram Mishra for the respondent no.8.
The petitioner has raised a grievance against the selection of respondent no.8 as a PDS dealer as his candidature is claimed to be more suitable.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10035 of 2021 dt.24-08-2022 2/2 In view of the aforenoted controversy raised on behalf of the petitioner with respect to selection of respondent no.8, we deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a suitable complaint before the Divisional Commissioner within a period of thirty days, who, on receipt of such complaint, shall after hearing all the parties including the respondent no.8, pass a final order within a period of next sixty days giving reasons in support of his decision.
With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.08.2022 Transmission Date