Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22726 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar S/o Sakal ray Resident of Village- Kaumashikoh Behind of Ganpathi Pailesh, P.S.- Chowk, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

The accused/petitioners are named in the F.I.R. is in custody since 02.02.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trade of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 139 litres of illicit liquor.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22726 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 2/3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that recovery has been made from open place i.e. behind Ganpati Palace, which does not belongs to the petitioner, as such, it cannot be said that the alleged recovery has been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, chargesheet has already been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that recovery was made from open place, as per seizure list.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as the alleged recovery has not been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Patna City/concerned court, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22726 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 3/3 "(i)That petitioner shall not involve in the similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which, the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(ii) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner duly supported by the documents.

(iii) That one of the bailors shall be Sakal Ray, who is the father of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition."

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Katyayan/- U T