Rajo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23855 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2020 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RAJO PASWAN Son of Late Guro Paswan Resident of Village - Telghi Tola, Jairampur, P.s.- Bihpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
This is the second attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for bail. Earlier, vide order dated 05.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15039 of 2021, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected.
Vide order dated 11.05.2022, a report was called for from the learned Court below regarding the stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial. In compliance thereof, a report dated 20th May, 2022 has been sent by the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Naugachia, which is at Flag 'R' to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23855 of 2022(3) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 this application. In his report, the learned Judge has, inter alia, stated that the aforesaid case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur and is pending in the Court of learned A.D.J.-II, Naugachia as S. Tr. No.214/2021. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.
However, learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and S.P., Naugachia is directed to ensure production of the witnesses in the case on each and every date fixed without fail. Let a copy of this order be communicated to S.P., Naugachia by fax for needful.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T