Sudhir Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23252 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2019 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SUDHIR DAS Son of Late Deep Narayan Das Resident of Village - Sultanpur Madhopur, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-09-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, on 24.01.2019 at 8.00 pm, while the informant was closing his shop. Three motorcycle borne criminals came there and started firing upon him. Somehow, the informant and his brother saved their live and threatened him of dire consequene and also threatened him not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23252 of 2020(2) dt.11-09-2020 2/2 to depose before the court against petitioner and other coaccused Sarvesh Das in Runnisaidpur P.S. Case NO. 470 of 2017 which was lodged against them for the demand of ransom by the shopkeepers and landlord of a business complex. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Entire allegation is false and concocted. Petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2019.
Learned APP however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation and the fact that petitioner has got criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner abovenamed on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T