Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25940/2024bail rejected

Avinash Kumar Singh @ Avinash Kumar @ Avinash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25940 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-588 Year-2021 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== AVINASH KUMAR SINGH @ AVINASH KUMAR @ AVINASH KUMAR YADAV SON OF DHARMENDRA KUMAR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ISLAMGANJ, WARD NO. 15, PS- MOHANIA, DISTKAIMUR AT BHABUA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adarsh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 263 of 2022 arising out of Mohania P.S. Case No. 588 of 2021 dated 24.12.2021, lodged under Sections 364, 328,302,201 of the I.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 10.11.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24520 of 2022 and vide order dated 03.11.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53275 of 2023 in which liberty was granted to him to renew his prayer for bail after three months if the trial is not concluded.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25940 of 2024(4) dt.19-07-2024 2/2 that three months has already been lapsed and trial is still not concluded.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits report has been called for and upon perusal of report, it transpires that evidence has already been completed and presently case has been fixed for argument on behalf of the defense. and that it is true that the charge has already been framed in this case.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. As such, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. It is directed to the Trial Court that the trial shall be concluded on day to day basis and the accused is directed to support in the Trial.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U