Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49297/2016bail granted

Zaid Anwar @ Md. Zaid Anwar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49297 of 2016 (2) dt.23-11-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49297 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2015 Thana -AIRPORT District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Zaid Anwar @ Md. Zaid Anwar, son of Kaish Anwar, Resident of Mohalla- Gulistan, Naya Tola, Police Station- Phulwari, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 02.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9908 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.12.2015, up-till-now no prosecution witness has been examined though there was direction to conclude the trial within six months and liberty was given to the petitioner to renew his prayer of bail thereafter. Other co-accused have been allowed bail and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP fairly submits that the trial has not been concluded within the stipulated period. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49297 of 2016 (2) dt.23-11-2016 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Saurab Singh, J. M. Ist Class, Patna in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 183 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T