Arun Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8120 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -196 Year- 2016 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Arun Bhagat, Son of Late Ram Nandan Bhagat, resident of village - Dhankaul, P.S. Bajpatti, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Alok Kumar Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 196 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 372, 373 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only allegation as per the statement of victim girl recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. is that the petitioner was one of the persons, who was present at the time of forced marriage of the victim girl with other accused person of this case and except that there is nothing to show the involvement of the petitioner in the present case. Petitioner has clean antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8120 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-III, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 196 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

This is further subject to the conditions that;- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T