Patna High CourtCWJC/167/2015disposed

Shree Bhagwan Paswan @ Bhagwan Dusadh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-21Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.167 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Shree Bhagwan Paswan @ Bhagwan Dusadh son of Dukhi Dussadh, deed

2. Bahadur Dusadh Son Dukhi Dusadh,deed Both residents of Village- Pipari, P.S- Karagahar Distt- Rohtas (Sasaram,) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector of the Distt. Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. The Addl. Collector of the Distt. Rohtas at Sasaram

4. The Deputy Director Consolidation, at Sasaram.

5. The Consolidation Officer, Kargahar, Distt - Rohtas.

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sasaram Sub Division at Sasaram

7. The Anchal Adhikari, Anchal Karagahar, P.S- Karagahar, Distt.Rohtas (Sasaram).

8. The S.P of Distt. Rohtas (Sasaram).

9. Ram Ashraya Rai son of Harihar Rai, Deed

10. Awadhesh Rai son of Ganga Rai, deed,

11. Arvinda Singh son of Jagannath Singh

12. Banarshi Singh son of Dharam Raj Singh All resident of village- Pipri, P.O - Gonj, P.S- Karagahar, Distt- Rohtas(Sasaram). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Mohan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajit Pratap Singh, SC-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 21-07-2015 The petitioners have questioned the orders passed by the authorities under the settlement manual. The order passed by the Additional Collector, Rohtas in Settlement Appeal Case No. 3 of 1996-97 partially confirming the order passed by the Circle Officer in Settlement Case No. 56 of 1982 / 566 of 1983, copy of which orders are placed at Annexure- 6 and 7 respectively.

Patna High Court CWJC No.167 of 2015 (3) dt.21-07-2015 In view of the provisions underlying Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and in view of the enactments listed thereunder, the petitioner should exhaust the alternative remedy so available to him. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U