Raghwendra Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52201 of 2014 (2) dt.06-01-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52201 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -702 Year- 2013 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Raghwendra Singh, son of Rajesh Singh, resident of village-Brahpur, P.S. Nand Ganj, District Gajipur (U.P.) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Pammi Singh, wife of Raghwendra Singh .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 702 of 2013 in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

Without entering into the merit of this case, this petition stands disposed of with direction to petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail before the court below within six weeks from today and, if, petitioner does so, the concerned court shall release the petitioner on provisional bail for the period of four months on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52201 of 2014 (2) dt.06-01-2015 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned court and after releasing the petitioner, the concerned court shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 2 fixing date for conciliation and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties within the above stated period of four months.

It goes without saying that if the concerned court succeeds in his attempt, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the concerned court itself, but if the concerned court fails in his attempt due to rigid and non cooperative approach of the petitioner, the provisional bail granted to him shall not be confirmed by the concerned court and in that event petitioner shall be taken into custody by the concerned court. It is needless to say that, if, the concerned court fails in his attempt due to non cooperative and rigid approach of the opposite party no. 2, the concerned court shall confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T