Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54207/2016bail granted

Pankaj Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-11Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54207 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1082 Year- 2015 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Pankaj Sahni S/o Niranjan Sahni, resident of Village- Mushahari, P.S. Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1082 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 7629 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 18.4.2016 had rejected the prayer for bail with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year of judicial custody. The petitioner is in custody since 3.12.2015.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody, let the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Sahni, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54207 of 2016 (2) dt.11-01-2017 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1082 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T