Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.72862 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-548 Year-2018 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar, S/o Jagan Bind, Resident of Singriyawan, P.S.-Sahjehan Pur, Dist.-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tilak Sao, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 548 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant has lodged a written complaint against unknown that his motorcycle was kept in his garrage and when he returned, the motorcycle was found missing and even after much search same could not be found and as such he instituted the present case with respect to theft of his motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72862 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 falsely implicated in this case on the basis of his self-confession of his involvement in theft of said motorcycle. Chargesheet has already been submitted and he is in custody since 18.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Patnacity, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 548 of 2018, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T