Lalo Mahto @ Lalo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22414 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Lalo Mahto @ Lalo Kumar Son Of Turant Lal Mahto Resident Of VillageKhori, Ps- Hasanpur, Distt- Samstipur 2.

Ajay Mahto @ Ajay Kumar Son Of Sri Ratan Mahto Resident Of VillageKhori, Ps- Hasanpur, Distt- Samstipur 3.

Nanu Mahto @ Balmiky Mahto @ Nunu Mahto @ Balmiky Kumar Son Of Sri Ratan Mahto Resident Of Village- Khori, Ps- Hasanpur, Distt- Samstipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 35 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. It is alleged that 35 liters wine is recovered from the orchard of co-accused. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22414 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 made by local Chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Hasanpur P.S. case No. 200/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/Nitin U T