Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18367/2017disposed

Rangilal Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18367 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -228 Year- 2016 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Rangilal Sahni, Son of Late Vishun Sahni, Resident of VillageKanuani, P.S. Sheohar, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 228 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by means of iron rod to the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is an old aged person aged about 65 years and earlier the injury was found simple but later on with the connivance of the doctor, the injury was shown to be dangerous to life. However, the injury is on the chick of the informant and cannot be dangerous to life.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18367 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2010 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, privilege of anticipatory bail. It is accordingly rejected.

Let petitioner surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below after considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and after verifying the nature of injury inflicted on the informant and also considering the age of petitioner shall pass an appropriate order, if possible on the same day, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T