Most. Sunaina Devi @ Smt. Sunaina Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8831 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -669 Year- 2016 Thana -KANKARBAGH District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Most. Sunaina Devi @ Smt. Sunaina Devi wife of late Suresh Prasad alias Suresh Prasad Yadav

2. Subodh Kumar son of late Suresh Prasad alias Suresh Prasad Yadav Both residents of Mohalla Chiraiyan Tarnd, Prithvipur Gajadhar Gali No. 3, Police Station - Kanakarbagh, District Patna. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Arshad Jamed Hashni, Advocate : Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S. Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in connection Kankarbagh PS case no. 669 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under sections 498(A)/307/34 of Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner no. 1 is the mother-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is the bhaisur of the informant, however, now the case has been compromised between the parties and a joint petition under Section 13 (B) of Hindu

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8831 of 2017 (2) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 Marriage Act is also going to be filed before the Family Court, Patna for divorce on mutual consent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender before the court below for regular bail along with a copy of petition under Section 13 (B) of Hindu Marriage Act and the court being satisfied, release the petitioners on bail on his own satisfaction otherwise, pass appropriate order on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With these observations, this bail application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T