Rina Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32463 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RINA DEVI W/o Janardan Sah R/o village- Harayia, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj.

.. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, Adv For the Informant : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State in virtual Court proceeding. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S.Case No.88 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 341,323,326,307,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and later on added Section 302 of IPC. The prosecution case, as per written report of informant Shushila Devi, in brief, is that she had married her daughter Sunita Devi with Tarkeshwar Sah in accordance with Hindu customs and since the time of marriage her Deyadin Rina Devi (petitioner) has been trying to do away her life. On 31.03.2020 the petitioner began quarreling and abusing with her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32463 of 2021(5) dt.15-02-2022 2/3 daughter at 4.00 hours and thrown kerosene oil upon and ablaze by match stick. Any how the villagers extinguished the fire and brought her to Sadar Hospital, Gopalganj. Since the daughter of informant burnt much, hence, the Doctor referred her to Gorakhpur where her treatment was going on.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. She has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the petitioner is Gotani of the deceased.

Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. for the State have opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the basis of the material available on the record and the case diary and submits that in para-38 of the case diary in which the deceased in her statement has supported the allegation as alleged in the FIR.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S.Case No.88 of 2020 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Gopalganj.

Prayer is refused.

However, the learned Trial Court is directed to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32463 of 2021(5) dt.15-02-2022 3/3 expedite the trial.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T