Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54576/2016bail granted

Niraj Mahto @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54576 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -151 Year- 2011 Thana -BRAHMPURA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Niraj Mahto @ Niraj Kumar, Son of late Ramu Mahto, Resident of Village Brahmapura, Soda Godown, P.S. Brahmapura, Dist. Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Punam Shrivastava, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh, APP-174 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Brahmapura (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 151 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/420/467/468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been roped in this case on the basis of confessional statement of one Kailash Kumar and that he has already been granted bail vide order dated 18.01.2012 in Cr. Misc. No. 45200 of 2011 passed by another coordinate Bench of this Court and the petitioner is suffering in judicial custody since 28.09.2016. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54576 of 2016 (2) dt.23-12-2016 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahmapura (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 151 of 2011, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Rishi/- U T