Vivek Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23356 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2021 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH Son of Sri Yogesh Singh Resident of VillageGareya Tola, Dumaigarh, Police Manjhi, District- Saran (Chapra). 2.

Ravindra Chaudhary S/o Krishana Chaudhary Resident of Village- Gareya Tola, Dumaigarh, Police Manjhi, District- Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land Santosh gave order to which Kanhaiya fired but missed, Birbal assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head , further accused persons assaulted his uncle by dab causing injury on head, it is next alleged that Kamal assaulted his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23356 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 2/3 brother by an iron rod causing injury on head. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant has specifically alleged as to who assaulted whom and where, it next submitted that as far as these petitioners are concerned, the allegation of assault against them is not specific, it is thus submitted that though injury suffered by the injured is grievous but then allegation of assault against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23356 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 3/3 with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 192 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T