← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22412/2023bail granted

Chhotu Yadav @ Chotu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22412 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2017 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== CHHOTU YADAV @ CHOTU YADAV S/O BAIJNATH YADAV @ BAJNATH YADAV @ BAIDYANATH YADAV R/O Village- Kamalpur Barmotar, P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baidya Nath Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 321 of 2017 dated 04.08.2017 registered for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 504, 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have abducted the daughter of the informant for illegal purposes.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel has further submitted that the victim in her statement recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C has stated that she herself went with the petitioner of her own will and solemnized

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22412 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 marriage with him and leading conjugal life with the petitioner. There was love affairs between the parties and the victim was not forced to have illicit relationship with another person. The victim is a major girl. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the material available in the case diary, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 321 of 2017, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T