Wokil Keshri @ Vakil Keshri v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16663 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1048 Year- 2014 Thana -KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE DistrictKHAGARIA ====================================================== WOKIL KESHRI @ VAKIL KESHRI .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Pd. Keshri For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1048C/2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of D.P. Act.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is husband of the complainant and allegation against him is of demanding Rs. one lakh from the family members of the complainant as dowry and performing another marriage.
It has further been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is aged about 60 years and marriage was solemnized with complainant about 40 years ago and their sons and daughters are grown up and having their own children and now at this stage allegation has been levelled against him that he is demanding Rs. one lakh as dowry appears palpably false and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16663 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/2 concocted against him.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1048C/2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ravi/- U T