Vipin Kumar Yadav @ Bipin Kumar Yadav @ Bipen Kumar @ Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22964 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== VIPIN KUMAR YADAV @ BIPIN KUMAR YADAV @ BIPEN KUMAR @ VIPIN KUMAR S/O BALMOHAN YADAV R/O Village- Akurahwan, P.STankuppa, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Manisha Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 427, 353 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioner along with 100 unknown miscreants blocked the road on account of accidental death and when the informant along with the police team tried to pacify the matter, the accused persons became aggressive and started pelting stones and they assaulted the police team with lathi and danda and even damaged the police vehicle and thus obstructed the police personnel in discharging their official duties.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22964 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that since the accident has occurred near to his place, as such he also went to the place of occurrence to see what was happening, it is next submitted that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case No. 85 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T