Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1432/2017rejected

Ram Sakal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1432 of 2017 (3) dt.23-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1432 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -398 Year- 2016 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Ram Sakal Singh, Son of late Basudev Yadav, Resident of VillagePatpura, Police Station-Dehri (Toan), District-Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2016 in connection with Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No. 398 of 2016 registered under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on account of a land dispute. The petitioner, who is of 62 years of his age, is suffering from chronic disease and have no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is languishing in custody for the last three months. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. alleging that he has assaulted the informant's husband, resultantly, he died. Moreover, prosecution version has been supported by the witnesses,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1432 of 2017 (3) dt.23-02-2017 which is evident from paragraphs 7, 8, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38 of the case diary.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T