Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25421/2024dismissed

Babloo Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25421 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1234 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Babloo Sah Son of Late Kapil Dev Sah Resident of Village- Sukhasan, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura 2.

Amrendra Sah @ Amrendra Kumar Sah Son of Ghan Shyam Sah Resident of Village- Kolhaipatti, P.S.- Murliganj, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 27496 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1234 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Amarjit Kumar Son Of Deonarayan Sah Resident Of Village- Sakarpura, PsMadhepura (BHARRAHI), Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 25421 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 27496 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Madhepura (O.P. Bharahi) P.S. Case No. 1234 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25421 of 2024(3) dt.28-06-2024 2/2 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is a case of triple murder. During investigation, materials have come to connect these petitioners with the crime. The petitioners are in jail since 22.12.2023.

4. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, these applications for regular bail are rejected.

6. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioners and conclude the same at the earliest. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T