Shubham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25925 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Shubham Kumar S/o- Chunnu Thakur @ Vijay Kumar Sharma VillageChhapra Megh Police Station- Musahari District- Muzzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 21 litres of liquor from the house of Chunnu Thakur and 32.25 litres of liquor from the house of Diwakar Thakur. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and after the amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with and petitioner came to be implicated based on the fact that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25925 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 he is son of Chunnu Thakur based on suspicion. 5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7.
It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T