Naresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40947 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2015 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ====================================================== Naresh Yadav Son of Late Bishu Yadav, resident of village - Dhawatar, P.S. Sono, District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : M/s Mrityunjay Kumar and Umesh Prasad, Advs. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with U.A.P. Case No. 89 of 2015 arising from Sono P.S. Case No. 127 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, sections 16,17,18,19,20,21,22 of U.A.P. Act and section 3/ 4 of the Expositive Substance Act. The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 6469 of 2016 and this Court, vide order dated 01.03.2016, rejected the same but the liberty was given to renew his prayer for bail after six months. In such view of the matter, let the petitioner, Naresh Yadav, be released on bail on his furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40947 of 2016 (2) dt.21-09-2016 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Jamui in connection with U.A.P. Case No. 89 of 2015 arising from Sono P.S. Case No. 127 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to Sono Police Station by 7th of every month at least for six months and in case of failure without any valid rhyme or reason, the bail of the petitioner will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T