Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52560/2016bail granted

Sunil Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-16Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52560 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -191 Year- 2012 Thana -RAMNAGAR District- WESTCHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Sunil Jaiswal, Son of Ramchandra Jaiswal, Resident of Rasulabad Teliyarganj, near Thakur Dwar Mandir, Allahabad, P.S. - Shiv Kutti, District - Allahabad (U.P.).

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 02.11.2016 in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 191 of 2012 for the alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as he has not induced for deposit of Rs. 20,000/- to his account by the informant. In any event, the petitioner offers to deposit the said amount of Rs. 20,000/- before the trial Court. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 191 of 2012 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52560 of 2016 (2) dt.16-12-2016 20,000/- (Twenty thousand only) before the learned trial Court and such deposit shall be subject to result of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T