Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20956/2020bail granted

Chhatri Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-07-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20956 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2020 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Chhatri Yadav, aged about 45 years, male, son of Sagar Yadav Resident of Village - Dan Nagar, P.S.- Town Thana, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the State :

Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately after the lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof. I.A. No. 01 of 2020 This interlocutory application has been filed through email on 07.07.2020 for amendment/correction of P.S. Case number and name in the prayer portion of the bail petition. It is stated that in the prayer portion of the main bail petition, P.S. Case number has wrongly been written as Khagaria P.S. Case No. 650 of 2019 instead of Parbatta P.S. Case No. 74 of 2020 as correctly mentioned in para 1 of the petition.

2. As prayed, P.S. Case name and number in the prayer portion of the main bail petition is permitted to be corrected to read as Parbatta P.S. Case No. 74 of 2020.

3. I.A. No. 01 of 2020 stands allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20956 of 2020(4) dt.22-07-2020 2/2 Cr. Misc. 20956 of 2020 The petitioner is in custody since 29.02.2020 in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 74 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 34.800 litres of country made liquor. The petitioner denies recovery of the said goods from his physical or conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

3. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

4. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 29.02.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 74 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

5. Office shall ensure that all defects have been removed and compliance with the notices of this Court has been made, as well as the aforesaid correction in the bail petition, within the stipulated time as provided in the first para hereinabove.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T