Bhakta Mandal@Bhagta Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.72405 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2013 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bhakta Mandal @ Bhagta Mandal son of Paro Mandal @ Prabhu Mandal, resident of Sadhuwa, P.S. Rangra (Gopalpur), District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.SriRamchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2013 giving rise in Sessions Trial No. 290 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation in brief is that the accused persons after killing the son of the informant escaped away. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that similarly placed co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court as contained in Annexures 3 and 4.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72405 of 2018(3) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Naugachia in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2013 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 290 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T