← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1604/2024disposed

Md. Danish @ Shalu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1604 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Danish @ Shalu Son Of Md. Haidar Imam Resident Of Village- Lala Toli, Khajekalan, Ps- Khajekalan, Dist- Patna ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sunita Devi Wife Of Late Den Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Sadar Gali, Near Kali Mandir, Adarsh Colony, Ps- Khajekalan, Dist- Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the state.

2. The instance application for regular bail has been filed by the appellant in connection with Special Case No. 80 of 2023 arising out of Khajekalan P.s. Case No. 35 of 2023 instituted for the offence u/s 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and sections 3(I)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act.

3. Earlier the application for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 14.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. (SJ) No. 4503 of 2023 with a direction to expedite the trial.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1604 of 2024(3) dt.02-05-2024 2/2

4. In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report with regard to the present stage of trial has been received by which it appears that the trial is likely to be concluded with a period of three months.

5. No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner, as such, his prayer is rejected.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

7. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within stipulated period of time i.e. three months, failing which the appellant may renew his prayer of bail.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T