Sultun Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19774 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2018 Thana- ANGARGHAT District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

SULTUN PASWAN Son of Horil Paswan 2.

Bhawan Paswan Son of Sultan Paswan Bot resident of Village - Harpur Rewari, P.S.- Angarghat, DistrictSamastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Angarghat P.S.Case no.40 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, 341, 354, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story is that the accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed, abused the informant and the petitioner no.2 assaulted the son of the informant by Hasuli causing injury on his thigh, Hriday Paswan was assaulted by Bhawan Paswan (petitioner no.2) by Tarchewa, causing injury to him and his daughter was also assaulted by Pawan Paswan and further allegation is that the petitioner no.1 (Sultan Paswan)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19774 of 2019(3) dt.16-05-2019 2/2 thrashed Laxman Paswan and further allegation is that Sultun Paswan also assaulted by rod.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the occurrence took place with respect to dispute between the children of both parties and there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner no.1 Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that there are allegation against both the petitioners of assault and as one person has died and several persons had received injuries. .

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. With the above direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T