Brij Kishore Lal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court MJC No.2178 of 2013 (6) dt.22-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2178 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15760 of 2012 ====================================================== Brij Kishore Lal S/O Late Goverdhan Lal Resident Of Village- Akhlashpur, P.S- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri B. Rajendra S/O Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Kamlesh Kumar Choudhary S/O Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Special Range, Harding Road, Barrack No. 2, Patna.

3. Sri Sati Kant Jha S/O Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Sasaram, Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Chandravir Narayan S/O Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

5. Sri Nand Lal Ram S/O Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division-2, Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

6. Sri I.D.S. Dhariwal S/O Accountant General, Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Marg, R- Block, Patna. Bihar.

.... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, GA-7 Mr. Dilip Kumar, AC to GA-7 For the Acct. General : Mr. Ram Kindar Choubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner has come to this Court on account of non-compliance of the order dated 3.9.2012 passed in CWJC No. 15760 of 2012 by which the respondents were directed to verify the claim of the petitioner and thereafter make payment of the amounts found due and payable to the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.2178 of 2013 (6) dt.22-06-2016 In the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 4, it is stated that all the amounts have been paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest wherever applicable, the details of which have been supplied along with the calculation chart.

In the above circumstances, the contempt application is dismissed.

In case the petitioner finds any discrepancy in the figures provided by the opposite parties, he can approach the opposite parties for rectification of the error and consequent payment of any additional amount arising therefrom. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) S.Pandey/- U