Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72833/2018bail granted

Ram Murti Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-13Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72833 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2016 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ram Murti Yadav Son of Satya Narayan Yadav Resident of VillageBakharpur, P.S. Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged in his written complaint that while he was going on his motorcycle, FIR named five accused including the petitioner snatched his motorcycle and fled away. However, in his deposition he has stated that he has named the petitioner on the basis of suspicion.

Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 17.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72833 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U