Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20994 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2020 Thana- BRAHMPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ANKIT KUMAR S/o Awadh Bihari Ray Resident of Village-Krishna Toli, Sant Nagar, Ward No.2, P.S.-Brahmpura, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. P.K.Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately after the lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2020 in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 111/2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 272 and 274 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2018).
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 23.250 litres of foreign liquor. The petitioner denies recovery of the said goods from his physical or conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.
5. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20994 of 2020(2) dt.26-06-2020 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 111/2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall ensure that all defects have been removed and compliance with the notices of this Court has been made, within the stipulated time as provided in para 1 hereinabove.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T