Patna High CourtMJC/4773/2010dismissed

Chandrika Mochi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

2017-03-03Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4773 of 2010 =========================================================== Chandrika Mochi, Son of Late Rajgir Mokchi, resident of Village: Sigori Police Station: Sigori, P.O.: Sigori, Via: Paliganj, District: Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Ashutosh, Special Secretary-cum-Director, Primary Education Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Shashi Bhushan Roy, the District Superintendent of Education Patna

4. Smita Bharti, Sub. Divisional Education Officer, Danapur, Patna

5. Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, The Block Education Extension Officer, Bikram, District: Patna

6. Krishna Mohan Thakur, the Block Education Extension Officer, Paliganj, District: Patna

7. Rameshwar Singh, Area Education Officer, Vikram, Patna

8. Subash Yadav, the Headmaster, Primary School, Madhorwa and Kathotia, South Maner, District: Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Achal Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Niraj Kumar Sinha, AC to PAAG-2 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-03-2017 The writ application filed by the petitioner was allowed on 22nd June, 2010 with direction to District Superintendent of Education to examine the service record of the petitioner and to fix pay-scale as was prevalent in the relevant period. In terms of the said direction, a speaking order has been passed by the District Superintendent of Education on 16.8.2011 (Annexure-A to the show cause). Thus, the direction stands complied with. The present contempt petition is rendered as infructuous and is disposed of as such.

Patna High Court MJC No.4773 of 2010 dt.03-03-2017 2/2 The petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to such remedy, if aggrieved against the order passed, as is available to the petitioner in accordance with law.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 07.03.2017 Transmission Date N/A