Md. Jasim @ Banti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20767 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Md. Jasim @ Banti, Son of Late Shamim, Resident of Mohalla- Kabirpur, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Tatarpur (Vishwa Vidyalaya) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding unknown miscreants having intercepted the informant and thereafter, had snatched a sum of Rs. 7600/-.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the present case though neither any recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner regarding the stolen articles nor any Test Identification Parade has been held to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20767 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 is submitted that though the petitioner is an accused in one other case, but he is on bail. The petitioner is stated to be languishing in custody since 10.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Bhagalpur, in connection with Tatarpur (Vishwa Vidyalaya) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018, subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) khushbu/- U T