Jay Prakash Tiwari @ Jaiprakash Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33882 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-926 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== JAY PRAKASH TIWARI @ JAIPRAKASH TIWARI Son of Late Jameshwar Tiwari Resident of Village - Naraon, P.S.- Bhabua, District - Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ritu Tiwari Wife of Jaiprakash Tiwari Resident of Village - Naraon, P.S.- Bhabua, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. At present address- Ritu Tiwari D/O Anil Choubey, Resident of Village - Garra, P.S.- Nuaon, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. Mob. No. 6204034442.

3.

Anil Choubey Son of Late Umapati Choubey Resident of Village - Garra, P.S.- Nuaon, District - Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33882 of 2021(2) dt.05-08-2021 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Complaint Case No. 926 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33882 of 2021(2) dt.05-08-2021 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T