Sanni Kumar @ Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22512 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2025 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Sanni Kumar @ Sunny Kumar, Son of Shivjee Yadav @ Shivaji Yadav, Resident Of Mohalla- Pahari Gachhy, Ward No 45, P.S.- Muphasil (Mufassil), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that three unknown miscreants allegedly snatched the motorcycle of the informant at gunpoint.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants and during the course of investigation, he was remanded from Mokama P.S. Case No. 362 of 2025 wherein he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22512 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 has given his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against him. No recovery was made from his possession and no Test Identification Parade (TIP) was conducted. It has also been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Mankush Kumar has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 12478 of 2026. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Barh, Patna, in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T