Jagmani Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28918 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2017 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Jagmani Rai, son of late Ramdeo Rai, Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S.- Patory (Mohanpur O.P.), District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suneil Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Patory (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 37 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased.
From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. Case diary has been received.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28918 of 2017 (3) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Patory (Mohanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 37 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chie, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T