← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1397/2013dismissed

Shyam Karan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-17Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1397 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14196 of 2010 ===========================================================

1. Shyam Karan Paswan Son Of Late Ugan Paswan Resident Of Village- Hafijpur Karmar, P.O.- Gowasa Sheikhpura, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Patna

3. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (P.H.E.D.) Patna East

4. Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (P.H.E.D.) Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. RADHE SHYAM KUMAR For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJESH KUMAR =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 17-02-2017 I.A. No. 7874 of 2013 has been filed for condonation of delay of 19 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the Interlocutory Application, the delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 7874 of 2013 is allowed.

Re: L.P.A. No. 1397 of 2013.

The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against an order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 11.07.2013 in C.W.J.C. No. 14196 of 2010 whereby the writ petition

Patna High Court LPA No.1397 of 2013 dt.17-02-2017 2/2 of the appellant has been dismissed on the ground that the death of the bread earner had happened on 18.08.1998 and after more then 11 years of such death, compassionate appointment is not required to be given as a measure of providing employment to a offspring of the employee. The decision of the learned Single Judge refusing to interfere with the order of rejection dated 03.07.2010 cannot be said to be bad in law.

The Letters Patent Appeal has no merit. Therefore, it is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Amin/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date