← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8213/2019disposed

Rinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-16Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8213 of 2019 ====================================================== Rinki Devi, aged about 28 years, female, W/o Sri Pramod Kumar, Resident of Village-Balia Kothi, P.O. and P.S.-Nasariganj, District-Rohtas (Sasaram). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Nasariganj, Rohtas. 6.

The Mahila Observer (Pravekshika) Nasariganj, Rohtas. 7.

Shabnam Khatoon, aged about 26 years, female, Wife of Md. Asalam Ansari, Resident of Village-Balia Kothi, P.O. and P.S.-Nasariganj, DistrictRohtas (Sasaram). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap (GP-2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-05-2019 The petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of private respondent No. 7 on the post of Anganbari Sevika at the concerned Anganbari Centre in the district of Rohtas (Sasaram).

2. The complaint of the petitioner is on the ground that necessary documents were not furnished by private respondent No. 7, but still she was selected as

Patna High Court CWJC No.8213 of 2019 dt.16-05-2019 2/2 Anganbari Sevika. What has further aggrieved the petitioner is that despite the complaint filed by her in time before the District programme Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram, the same has not yet been disposed off.

3. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh complaint before the District Programme Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram within a period of four weeks from today, who, on receipt of such complaint, after verifying the records and hearing the necessary parties, viz., the petitioner, private respondent No. 7 and other stakeholders, shall pass necessary order in accordance with law within a further period of ten weeks thereafter.

4. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 17.05.2019 Transmission Date N/A