← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/805/2015disposed

Md. Shahjahan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-09Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 805 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Md. Shahjahan Son of Safdar Ali, resident of village Kauwa More, P.O. Kant Nagar, P.S. Barari, District Katihar.

2. Md. Mozibul Haque Son of Md. Nisar Ali, resident of village Bahera, P.O. Bhith Bhagwanpur, P.S. Bheja District Madhubani.

3. Md. Serajuddin son of Md. Mohsin Ali, resident of village Kachhua, P.O Sujapur, P.S. Barari, District Katihar.

4. Mohammad Alam, Son of Md. Phul Hasan resident of village and P.O. Simri, District Madhubani.

5. Md. Ahsunallah Son of Md. Tamijuddin, resident of village Devinagar, P.O. Jagaili, District Purnea.

6. Pradip Thakur Son of Raghunath Thakur resident of village and P.O. Gandhi Nagar, Simri, District Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Education Officer, Katihar, District- Katihar.

3. The District Education Officer Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

4. The District Education Officer, Purnea, District- Purnea. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Mr. Uday Prasad, A.C. to G.P. 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State is present.

2. On 05.01.2018, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and by way of indulgence, the matter was adjourned.

3. Today also since nobody is appearing on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ application, the Court can only

Patna High Court CWJC No.805 of 2015 (6) dt.09-01-2018 2/2 presume that either the grievance of the petitioners have been redressed or they are not interested in pursuing the matter.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U