Vimla Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55523 of 2016 Arising Out of Cheriya Bariyarpur PS.Case No. -84 of 2016 Thana -CHARIABARIYARPUR District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Vimla Devi Wife of Navin Prasad Singh Resident of VillageBakhtiyarpur Pubari Tola P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpuyr P.S. Case No. 84 of 2016 registered for offences under Sections 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the kidnapped boy was recovered from the house of the petitioner. However, the sister of the petitioner has come along with the kidnapped boy on the pretext that he is grand son and as such, on good faith, she kept the boy in her house. The petitioner remained in custody for about eight months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that this case is under
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55523 of 2016 (3) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code and the boy was recovered from her house.
Having heard both sides, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, from perusal of the record, it appears that the case has been committed to the court of Sessions, the learned court below is directed to expedite the trial by conducting the same on day to day basis and conclude the same, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order by the court below. If the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner is at liberty to renew her prayer for bail.
With this observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U