← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/660/2022disposed

Narsingh Tanti, v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.660 of 2022 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1899 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Narsingh Tanti, son of Biranchi Tanti, resident of Village-Mangarh, P.S.- Dharhara, District-Munger.

5.

Kumari Punam Wife of Narsingh Tanti, resident of Village-Mangarh, P.S.- Dharhara, District-Munger.

6.

Ankit Kumar, son of Narsingh Tanti, resident of Village-Mangarh, P.S.- Dharhara, District-Munger.

7.

Abhilasha Devi, Daughter of Narsingh Tanti, resident of Village-Mangarh, P.S.-Dharhara, District-Munger.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Amir Subhani, s/o not known, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, s/o not known, the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, s/o not known, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, District-Munger.

4.

Sri Jagannath Reddi Jala Reddi, s/o not known, the Superintendent of Police, District-Munger.

5.

Sri Nandji Prasad, s/o not known, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Munger.

6.

Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, s/o not known, the SHO Dharahara Police Station, Munger.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Perused the show cause containing Annexure 'A' from which it appears that the Superintendent of Police, Munger has issued certain directions to the I.O. of the case and the I.O. has also been changed as per the order of this Court.

2. In the aforesaid view of the matter, there is no need

Patna High Court MJC No.660 of 2022(4) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 to proceed with the contempt application. It is dropped with an expectation that the concerned I.O. shall conduct further investigation in terms of the order of this Court and complete the same within a reasonable period.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U