← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7222/2019disposed

Rajkishor Prasad, v. Union Of India

2021-01-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7222 of 2019 ====================================================== Rajkishor Prasad, S/o Late Jodhan Singh, resident of Village Mohanpur P.O. P.S. and District- Nalanda- 803111.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union of India through archaeological Survey of India New Delhi. 2.

The Accounts Officer, Pay and Accounts Office, Archaeological Survey of India Delhi, Ministry of Culture, PAO, ASI, Janpath New Delhi- 110011. 3.

The Pay and Accounts Officer, Central Pension Plan Accounting Ministry of Finance, Govt. of Office India, Trikoot II Complex, Bhikhaji Cama Place, New Delhi- 110066.

4.

The Superintendent Archaeological Survey of India, Patna Circle, J.C. Road Patna.

5.

The Assistant Superintendent Archaeological Survey of India, Archaeological Museum, Nalanda.

6.

The Branch Manager, Meusium Link, Road, Opp Police Station Nalanda, Bihar- 803111 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For Union of India : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Canara Bank : Mr. Rajan Ghoshrave, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-01-2021 On 15.06.2020 and 24.09.2020, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. When the matter is taken up today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the Respondent No.6 i.e. Branch Manager, Canara Bank and learned counsel for the Union of India submit that the grievance/s of the petitioner has already been redressed.

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7222 of 2019(7) dt.07-01-2021 2/2 respondents, the present writ application stands disposed of with liberty that in case any of the grievance of the petitioner still requires to be redressed by the respondents, the petitioner will be at liberty to make an appropriate representation before the competent authority, the competent authority shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U