Ishwar Prasad Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.81 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18522 of 2009 ====================================================== Ishwar Prasad Choudhary, Son of Late Banarasi Prasad Choudhary, Resident of Village & P.O. Gurubazar, Police Station- Barai, DistrictKatihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Wasir Ahmad Khan, the Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Arvind Kumar Pandey, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Patna.
3. Sri Sudhir Kumar Thakur, the Conservator of Forest, Purnia.
4. Sri Vijay Nr. Prasad, the Divisional Forest Officer, Purnia.
5. Sri Dinesh Paswan, the Range Forest Officer, Katihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeeva Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr. S.K. Ranjan, AC to GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-01-2017 In the present case, a complaint has been made that the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18522 of 2009 dated 14.2.2011 has not been complied with. The operative portion of the order speaks that the petitioner has filed application for grant of Saw Mill licence that should be disposed of within six months from the date of production or receipt of a copy of the order. It will be relevant to quote the order, which is as follows:- "The relief sought is to be considered for grant of Saw Mill license on
Patna High Court MJC No.81 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2017 2/2 application submitted for the purpose as far back as 1995-96. The writ petition has been filed on 24.12.2009.
The application is disposed with the observation that, if the petitioner applies afresh in accordance with law, let the same be considered and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order."
The State has filed the show cause, attaching the order passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Purnea Forest Division, Purnea.
In such view of the matter, there is no need to proceed with the matter. Accordingly, the present proceeding is dropped.
However, if the petitioner is feeling aggrieved with the order, he may challenge the same before the appropriate Forum/Authority/Court.
Mahesh/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U