← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25426/2026bail granted

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-22Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25426 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2026 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== Chandan Kumar S/o Radhe Shyam Singh R/o Akhara Road, Yadubanshi Nagar, P.S.- Digha, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Suman Kumari Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, as amended uptodate.

3. Allegation is of recovery of 99 litres of foreign liquor from a tempo.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case due to enmity and highhandedness of the police. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or trade of liquor in any manner. The petitioner is not the owner of the seized tempo. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in the case on the disclosure made by co-accused Amarnath Thakur

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25426 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 due to enmity.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the F.I.R. and the fact the tempo from which liquor was recovered does not belong to the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C / Section 482 (2) BNSS.

7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T