← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8901/2013disposed

Dinesh Prasad Gupta v. Mostt. Kamla Devi And ORS

2016-05-20Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8901 of 2013 =========================================================== Dinesh Prasad Gupta Son Of Late Dwarika Prasad Resident Of Main Road, Thanapar, At And P.O. Danapur Cantt., Police Station Danapur, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Mostt. Kamla Devi Wife Of Late Tej Narain Gupta Resident Of Mohalla - Takiyapar, P.O. Digha, Police Station Danapur, District - Patna

2. Binod Kumar Gupta Son Of Late Tej Narayan Gupta Resident Of Mohalla - Takiyapar, P.O. Digha, Police Station Danapur, District - Patna

3. Anil Kumar Son Of Late Tej Narayan Gupta Resident Of Mohalla - Takiyapar, P.O. Digha, Police Station Danapur, District - Patna

4. Rajesh Kumar Son Of Late Tej Narayan Gupta Resident Of Mohalla - Takiyapar, P.O. Digha, Police Station Danapur, District - Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondent.

Gone through the order impugned. Also gone through the plaint of Title Suit no. 42/2001 (Annexure-3) as well as plaint of Eviction Suit no. 3/2002 (Annexure-7) of the supplementary affidavit. After going through these respective plaints, it looks desirable to direct that both the suits be tried by the same court and further, be disposed of by the same court and judgment be passed on the same day independently. The aforesaid direction should be properly complied with.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8901 of 2013 dt.20-05-2016 2/2 The respective learned counsels are also of the view that there should be speedy trial so that lis be decided conclusively at an earliest which, the learned lower court will appreciate and will endeavor to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within one year without granting any undue adjournment to either of the parties.

With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is dismissed.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) rinkee/- U